Blog · 29 Oct 2026 · By BitcoinSaving
Bitcoin savings vs a bank savings account
Most versions of this comparison cheat by choosing a flattering start date. This one does the opposite: it starts the Bitcoin plan in November 2021, within days of the all-time high, so the saver bought the top, the crash, and everything since. $100 a month for five years, into four places.
Try it on your own numbers
The BitcoinSaving app replays any amount, rhythm and start year on real prices back to 2010, with charts for your average cost and your stretches under water. The iPhone beta opens soon.
Free during the beta. Leave your email on the download page and the invite lands the moment it opens.
One short email a week
A real savings story, the numbers behind it, in plain words. Plus first access when the app launches.
| $100 a month, Nov 2021 to Oct 2026 | Put in | Value on 29 Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash in a drawer | $6,000 | $6,000, minus five years of inflation |
| Average savings account (0.5% APY) | $6,000 | $6,074 |
| High-yield savings account (4.0% APY) | $6,000 | $6,630 |
| Bitcoin, bought monthly | $6,000 | $11,390 (0.139 BTC, average cost $43,090) |
Bank rates are a flat assumption for the whole period, which is generous to the bank: high-yield rates were under 1 percent for much of 2021 and 2022. Bitcoin figures recomputed by BitcoinSaving on daily prices (Coinbase, via btcdollarcostaverage.com).
The part the bank brochure and the Bitcoin post both skip
The Bitcoin row was not ahead for most of the five years. It was behind, painfully: by November 2022 the saver had put in $1,300 and the stack was worth about $677, roughly half, while the bank accounts had quietly done exactly what they promised. Anyone who needed that money in 2022, for a deposit, a car, an emergency, would have been right to keep it in the bank. The Bitcoin saver only pulled ahead by still buying through 2023 at prices most people had given up on, and then holding into the recovery. The return was payment for tolerating the middle.
An earlier start tells the same story with bigger numbers: $100 a month from January 2020 is $23,358 today on $8,200 paid in, against $9,412 in the 4 percent account. The gap between the two assets is real and historically wide. The gap between their risk profiles is wider.
What a bank account still does better
Three things, and they matter. First, certainty: a deposit is worth a known number tomorrow, and government insurance (FDIC in the US) backs it; Bitcoin has no insurance and no floor. Second, calm: savings accounts never halve on paper, so money earmarked for a near-term goal stays intact. Third, simplicity: no keys to guard, no exchange accounts, no tax lots to track. Emergency funds and money needed within about two years belong in the boring account. The comparison above is about the other money: the small, regular surplus you will not need soon and are currently watching inflation trim.
The sensible shape for most people is both accounts, doing different jobs. Keep the safety money in the bank, and if you save in Bitcoin, size it like the November 2021 saver had to live it: amounts small enough that a 50 percent paper loss changes nothing about your month. Run your own amount on the DCA calculator, and for lump sums against the same history, the comparison page has the other half of the story.
Related stories
DCA vs lump sum: which actually won?
Seven of nine January starts went to the lump sum. The two that did not explain what dollar-cost averaging is really for.
What $100 became in 10 years
One $100 bill, four homes, ten years: the decade-length version of the bank-versus-Bitcoin question.